Source 1:
Who is the source?
Somebody wrote this for http://geology.com/pangea.htm
What credentials does the source have?
This is not credential.
How credible is the source?
This is not credential.
What does the source say about the fact?
This source shows the moving of the continenents from 225 million years ago.
Do you believe the source?
Yes, I believe the source because if you look at the pictures closely the conentents fit together like puzzle peices from 225 million years ago to all the way to today.
Why or why not?
^
Source 2:
Who is the source?
Lois Van Wagner.
http://www.enchantedlearning.com/subjects/dinosaurs/glossary/Contdrift.shtml
What credentials does the source have?
He is from Yale-New Haven Teachers Institute.
How credible is the source?
Since i am not told what he does for a living this source could not be credible.
What does the source say about the fact?
The fossil record supports and gives credence to the theories of continental drift and plate tectonics.
Do you believe the source?
Yes, because they say they have fossil to support the theory.
Why or why not?
^
Source 3:
Who is the source?
Someone from http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=putting-pangeas-pieces-in
What credentials does the source have?
It does not have any credentials because a specific person did not write this, a group at Scientific American Inc. wrote it.
How credible is the source?
" "
What does the source say about the fact?
It says that there was in fact a pangea about 200 million years ago.
Do you believe the source?
Yes.
Why or why not?
I believe this source because I've done three now, and they have all said they same thing with a logical explanation.
After you have checked your fact against at least three sources, state whether you believe the fact or not, and explain why you believe that.
I do believe the fact because it is scientifically proven and has really explanations why the continents moved and are still moving to this day.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment